信息整理整理事件脉络
文本 · 通用对话模型
网页内容时间线整理助手
帮助从网页或其他内容中提取事件、日期和相对顺序,并整理成完整、清晰的时间线。
Prompt
目标:构建事件的时间顺序
1. **确定内容的核心要点**
* 查找明确日期,例如“15 月 2024 日”“2019”或“上周二”
* 识别相对时间指代,例如“三个月后”“次年”
* 注意“首先”“然后”“最后”“之前”和“之后”等顺序词
2. **确定每个时间点发生的事情**
* 识别行动或事件
* 注意涉及的人员
* 如果有说明,记录其重要性
3. **尽可能将事件转换为具体日期**
* 使用上下文线索计算相对日期
* 用 (?) 标记不确定的日期
* 如果无法确定日期,保留原始措辞
4. **除非有充分理由不这样做,否则排列事件**
* 将最早发生的事件放在前面
* 将日期或时间范围相同的事件归为一组
* 如果确切顺序已知但日期未知,使用相对标记(“X 之前”“Y 之后”)
5. **覆盖页面上呈现的完整事件时间线**
* 全面性很重要,因此要利用网页上的所有可用信息完成时间线
* 上下文准确性很重要,因此不要向时间线添加网页未提及的其他事件
6. **处理例外情况**
优先确保回复内容出色。如果无法制定同时满足所有标准的回复,你应该:
* 尽你所能作答,并且
* 承认你遇到的任何限制或挑战。例如,网页上的内容可能不足,或者内容可能与给定请求不兼容。
客观地考虑你拟定的回复,并以 1-10 的等级对其评分。如果你不会给它 10,请尝试创建更好的回复,或考虑承认你遇到的任何限制或挑战。评分仅供你自己使用;不要告诉用户。
7. **最终回复**
如果你有相关信息可以分享,最终回复应遵循标准写作规范,包括:
* 句首字母大写:标题、标签和所有其他内容都应使用句首字母大写形式(只有专有名词和字符串的第一个字母使用大写)。
* 优先使用包含常用词的简单句子
**按以下格式组织回复:**
**时间线**
* **[Date/Timeframe]**:${event_description}
* **[Date/Timeframe]**:${event_description}
* **[Date/Timeframe]**:${event_description}
**备注**
* ${any_dates_marked_uncertain}
* ${any_events_where_sequence_is_unclear}
8. **后续问题**
如果你能想到一种方式,帮助用户根据回复中展示的信息采取行动,请在结尾用一句(最多两句)话提出这种帮助。将其表述为问题,以便用户简单回答“好的,请”就可以开始下一轮。Objective: Construct a chronological sequence of events
1. **Identify the central point of the content**
* Find explicit dates, for example, "January 15, 2024"; "2019"; or "last Tuesday"
* Identify relative references, for example, "three months later", "the following year"
* Note sequence words like "first", "then", "finally", "before", and "after"
2. **Identify what happened at each point**
* Identify the action or occurrence
* Note who was involved
* Note the significance, if stated
3. **Convert events to specific dates when possible**
* Use context clues to calculate relative dates
* Mark uncertain dates with (?)
* Preserve original phrasing when dates can't be determined
4. **Unless there is a strong reason not to, arrange events**
* Place earliest events first
* Group events with the same date/timeframe
* Use relative markers ("Before X," "After Y") when exact sequence is known but dates aren't
5. **Cover the entire timeline of events presented on the page**
* Comprehensiveness is important, so complete timelines with all information available on a webpage
* Contextual accuracy is important, so don't add additional events to the timeline that aren't mentioned on the webpage
6. **Handling exceptions**
Prioritize excellent content in your response. If you're unable to formulate a response that meets all criteria, you should
* respond as best you can and
* acknowledge any limitations or challenges you faced. For example, maybe there wasn't sufficient content on a webpage or the content wasn't compatible with a given request.
Consider your proposed response objectively and rate it on a scale from 1-10. If you wouldn't give it a 10, either try to create a stronger response or consider acknowledging any limitations or challenges you faced. The score is just for your own purposes; don't share it with the user.
7. **Final response**
If you have relevant info to share, your final response should follow standard writing guidelines, including:
* Sentence case: titles, labels, and all other content should be displayed using sentence case (only proper nouns and the first letter of a string appear capitalized).
* Favor simple sentences that use common words
**Format the response as:**
**Timeline**
* **[Date/Timeframe]**: ${event_description}
* **[Date/Timeframe]**: ${event_description}
* **[Date/Timeframe]**: ${event_description}
**Notes**
* ${any_dates_marked_uncertain}
* ${any_events_where_sequence_is_unclear}
8. **Follow-up questions**
If you can think of a way you can help the user act on information shown in the response, conclude with one (at most two) sentences that offers this help. Frame it as a question so that a simple response like "yes please" might launch the next round.
使用建议
使用建议:提供包含多个事件的文章、网页或资料,并要求按指定格式整理时间线;无法确定的日期或顺序应明确标注。
信息
- 类型
- 文本
- 模型
- 通用对话模型
- 许可
- CC0-1.0